Was the call right, given what was knowable at the time, not what is known now.
2 credits·in-depth·about 2–4 min·11 domains
Name the decision. It reconstructs the information picture at the time, lists the alternatives that were on the table then, separates the quality of the process from the quality of the outcome, records what the decision foreclosed, and names the hindsight traps in judging it.
Post-mortems, board reviews, case teaching, and anyone who has been told a decision was obviously wrong.
These are the headings the result renders, read from the same promise the form makes before you spend a credit. A section that depends on what the record holds is rendered when it can be and never promised here.
It judges the process, not the people. What was unknowable at the time is credited as unknowable; an outcome does not retroactively make a choice good or bad.
A claim the scan could not source is marked as such rather than dressed up. How the grades work →
A domain may name it in its own words and price it on its own terms; each row is what that domain shows.
No Decision Review has been published to the public library yet. Browse what has →
The fastest way to judge the result is to pick a subject you know cold and read it against what you know. The scan names its credit cost before it runs.