The case for and the case against a proposition, each made as strongly as the evidence allows.
2 credits·in-depth·about 2–4 min·12 domains
State the proposition. It makes the case for it and the case against it in their strongest forms, isolates what the question turns on, says what each side must concede, reads where the evidence points, and records the common ground and the questions still open.
Students, debaters, editors and anyone preparing to argue a point who wants the other side made properly first.
These are the headings the result renders, read from the same promise the form makes before you spend a credit. A section that depends on what the record holds is rendered when it can be and never promised here.
It steelmans, it does not adjudicate. The read of where the evidence points is graded like every other claim, and a side with no documented case is not given an invented one.
A claim the scan could not source is marked as such rather than dressed up. How the grades work →
A domain may name it in its own words and price it on its own terms; each row is what that domain shows.
The weight of evidence favors fixed-price for mature, well-understood production work and cautions strongly against it for programs carrying significant technical or requirements immaturity — a distinction the 2026 Executive…
The weight of the current evidence favors the skeptical reading of the proposition as stated: McKinsey's flat 6% high-performer share and 37% any-impact share, corroborated directionally by MIT's independent pilot-failure…
The weight of the evidence favors a genuinely interdependent diagnosis rather than a clean win for either side: the supply-side contraction of the 2010s is real and well-documented, but California's finding that attrition…
The fastest way to judge the result is to pick a subject you know cold and read it against what you know. The scan names its credit cost before it runs.