Your clients pay for output per hour and for a trail they can check. WorldbyFlow multiplies the first and builds the second: every read carries its provenance, graded, so the consultancy, the fund or the journalist you hand it to can follow each claim back to its source.
Written for Contract researcher serving consultancies, funds, and journalists.·Runs in the General domain
Contract research is a different brief every week and the same standard every time. The scans here cover the shapes briefs usually take: an adversarial inquiry on a claim, a dated chronology, a cast list with leverage stated, a structured read on an unresolved case, and a set of attributed quotes from the people who know the subject.
A claim re-checked adversarially with a ledger of what held, what is contested and what could not be established. The deep brief, with the honesty a client can audit.
A dated timeline built from the record, each entry sourced, contested dates marked. The spine under a longer piece of work.
Who holds what leverage on a subject, from documented positions. The cast list a client asks for on day one.
An unresolved case laid out: what is established, what is disputed, what the competing accounts are and what would settle them. The brief for a subject with no clean answer.
What the people inside a subject have said on the record, attributed and quoted. The interviews you did not have time to conduct.
The order matters. The first read gives you the structure; the next ones fill the parts that are hardest to source by hand.
The dated, sourced spine. Check the contested dates against your own notes; where it flags one you missed, the tool has paid for itself.
Who matters and why, with sources. The page clients read first.
The adversarial re-check and ledger. Hand the client the "could not be established" list as a finding, not an apology.
Export as a PDF with the provenance ledger, or share as a page the client can open with every source live.
Every figure and quote links to where it came from. A claim the scan could not source is marked as such rather than dressed up.
Deliver as a PDF with the provenance ledger attached, or as a shared page the client opens without an account.
Ask a follow-up question of any result, or run a Red Team pass that tries to break its own conclusions before someone else does. How the grades work →
The AI-attributed layoff figure is a measure of what companies choose to disclose, not an independently audited count of jobs automation replaced, because Challenger's reason field depends entirely on employer language with no external verification step.
The fastest way to judge the result is to pick a subject you know cold and read it against what you know. If a colleague sent you here with an invitation, the credits land on your account when you sign up.