Who pays, who profits, and through what channels, with the total at stake.
2 credits·in-depth·about 2–4 min·12 domains
Name the arrangement: a subsidy, a contract, a market, a scandal. It maps the money flows, names who profits and who pays, states what the money rewards, marks where the trail goes dark, and lists the signals to watch and the questions the record leaves open.
Investigative reporters, procurement reviewers, policy analysts and anyone who has learned to start with the money.
These are the headings the result renders, read from the same promise the form makes before you spend a credit. A section that depends on what the record holds is rendered when it can be and never promised here.
Every figure carries the issuer and the period it covers. It does not allege wrongdoing; a flow the record does not document is marked as dark, not filled in.
A claim the scan could not source is marked as such rather than dressed up. How the grades work →
A domain may name it in its own words and price it on its own terms; each row is what that domain shows.
The largest and most durable dollars — federal Title II-A formula grants, state residency-grant programs, and staffing-agency contracts — flow to recruitment and stopgap coverage, while retention-side spending (mentor…
Stablecoin holders fund a zero-interest liability that issuers convert into a Treasury-yield asset — Tether keeps essentially all of that spread while Circle is contractually forced to hand roughly half of its gross reserve…
OpenAI has lined up roughly $1.15 trillion in compute commitments through 2035, yet almost none of the default risk sits on its own balance sheet — Oracle, Nvidia, CoreWeave's lenders and SoftBank hold it.
The fastest way to judge the result is to pick a subject you know cold and read it against what you know. The scan names its credit cost before it runs.