A public commitment is a claim with a date, and the report that cannot show the record behind it is a liability. WorldbyFlow grades commitments against what the documented record shows was delivered, and reads the disclosure rules, the figures and the interventions around them, so the report can withstand the reader who checks.
Written for Owns non-financial disclosure and reporting.·Runs in the Climate domain
Non-financial disclosure is a growing rulebook and a shrinking tolerance for unsupported claims. The scans here hold both: a track record on pledges, yours and your peers', the figures with issuers named, a regulatory map of the disclosure rules with status honesty, a read on an intervention you report on, a graded explanation when a headline metric moved, and a literature review on the question your board keeps asking.
Public commitments against what the documented record shows was delivered, dated. Run it on a peer, then on your own company, and read both as an auditor would.
The figures on a disclosure topic with each one's issuer and interpretation. Emissions and purchases, labeled by source.
Disclosure and green-claims rules with instrument, jurisdiction and authority named and status kept honest. The perimeter for this year's report.
An intervention you report on, read as evidence: what it has demonstrated, what is claimed, what is unknown. Offsets and fuels, graded.
A headline metric moved, scope 3 or a sales share. Candidate explanations graded against the record before the report explains it.
What the research says on a contested question, disagreements included. Whether offsets deliver, from the literature rather than the brochure.
The order matters. The first read gives you the structure; the next ones fill the parts that are hardest to source by hand.
Promised against delivered, dated. Then run it on your own commitments and read it as a journalist would.
Proposed kept apart from in force. The perimeter counsel can review.
What it has demonstrated and what is claimed. The evidence page under the claim in the report.
One pass that argues against your disclosures the way an activist investor will.
Every figure and quote links to where it came from. A claim the scan could not source is marked as such rather than dressed up.
Export the reads as PDFs for the reporting file, or share them as pages the assurance team can open with each grade and source.
Ask a follow-up question of any result, or run a Red Team pass that tries to break its own conclusions before someone else does. How the grades work →
The strongest case against making clothing brands pay for textile recycling is France: after 18 years of per-garment fees, about 32% of textiles are collected against a legally mandated 60% target.
The fastest way to judge the result is to pick a subject you know cold and read it against what you know. If a colleague sent you here with an invitation, the credits land on your account when you sign up.