A correction is only as strong as the evidence behind it. WorldbyFlow pairs each repeated claim with what the record actually shows and the evidence for the correction, excerpts the primary document verbatim, and reads a poll with its method and sponsor named, so the check can be checked.
Written for Runs verification for a newsroom or a fact-checking organisation.·Runs in the General domain
Verification is a discipline of going back to the source under time pressure. The scans here go back for you and show their path: a myth held against the record, the primary document excerpted with pinpoint citations, polling read to a standard, the tests that would settle a viral claim, and a graded explanation when a statistic everyone cites turns out to have moved.
A repeated claim paired with what the record shows and the evidence behind the correction. The check, with its receipts.
Verbatim excerpts from the primary document with pinpoint citations, contested readings marked and gaps stated. The source, quoted rather than described.
A poll read naming pollster, dates, sample, method and sponsor, spread shown. The check on the "polls show" sentence.
The tests that would prove a claim wrong, and what result each would give. The method behind a rating.
A statistic in a viral claim has moved. Candidate explanations graded against the record before the rating is written.
The order matters. The first read gives you the structure; the next ones fill the parts that are hardest to source by hand.
Compare its correction and evidence with yours. If the evidence it cites is the evidence you would cite, it can do the first pass.
Verbatim excerpts with citations. Confirm at the original; the citations shorten the trip.
Pollster, dates, method, sponsor, spread. The polling check to a published standard.
Export the source list for the article's footnotes, or share the read as a page readers can open.
Every figure and quote links to where it came from. A claim the scan could not source is marked as such rather than dressed up.
Export the sources for the footnotes, or share the read as a page linked from the published check.
Ask a follow-up question of any result, or run a Red Team pass that tries to break its own conclusions before someone else does. How the grades work →
The AI-attributed layoff figure is a measure of what companies choose to disclose, not an independently audited count of jobs automation replaced, because Challenger's reason field depends entirely on employer language with no external verification step.
The fastest way to judge the result is to pick a subject you know cold and read it against what you know. If a colleague sent you here with an invitation, the credits land on your account when you sign up.